Las Vegas Termination of Parental Rights Lawyer
Las Vegas Termination of Parental Rights Attorneys
Serving Las Vegas, North Las Vegas, Henderson, Overton, Moapa Valley, Mesquite, Laughlin, and all of Clark County, Nevada
The Supreme Court of Nevada has consistently recognized that severing the parent-child relationship is an extreme measure and an exercise of awesome power. The sacredness of parental rights requires a high standard of proof before a child can be judicially taken away. If the Clark County Department of Family Services (DFS) starts the process to terminate your parental rights, then act quickly to obtain a qualified and experienced Las Vegas termination of parental rights attorneys.
The lawyers at Mills & Anderson are experienced in representing parents in dependency proceedings for the termination of parental rights in Las Vegas and Clark County, Nevada. Act quickly to protect your rights and the rights of your child. We also represent the non-offending parent, relatives, guardians or other relatives in these difficult and complicated cases.
The Las Vegas termination of parental rights attorneys at Mills & Anderson understand that each case and each family is unique. After DFS contends that parental fault existed based on abandonment, neglect, unfitness, failure of parental adjustment, or that the parent posed a risk of harm to the child or children, we work hard to show that court that our proposed resolution is in the best interest of the child.
Call (725) 999-6468 today to discuss the facts of your unique case.
Dependency Proceedings Under Nevada Law
The juvenile division of the district court in Clark County, Nevada, hears dependency proceedings. Under NRS 128.110, in an action to terminate perennial rights, the court can order that the child is forever free from their parent’s custody and control. In many cases, the parents are represented by counsel in the NRS Chapter 432B proceedings. Parents can choose to retain private counsel to represent their interests. Other individuals in the case might all seek out legal representation including the non-offending parent and any relatives that are seeking guardianship, temporary custody, or adoption of the child.
Why Choose Mills & Anderson?
Personalized Service. Proven Results.
-
Comprehensive Legal SolutionsFrom family law and estate planning to business law, we provide trusted legal guidance for every stage of life.
-
Experienced, Collaborative TeamEvery case benefits from the combined knowledge of our attorneys, giving you thoughtful strategies and well-rounded legal support.
-
Personalized Attention
You'll work directly with your attorney and a dedicated paralegal, ensuring responsive communication and a legal strategy tailored to your needs.
-
Honest, Practical Guidance
We provide straightforward advice, explain your options clearly, and focus on solutions that protect your future—not just resolve today's issue.
-
Se Habla Español
Our Spanish-speaking attorney is here to provide clear, compassionate legal guidance, making quality representation accessible to more members of our community.
-
Accessible & ResponsiveWe make it easy to get the answers you need with prompt communication and nearly immediate access to our team during business hours.
The Trial on the Petition to Terminate Parental Rights
The most extreme cases will proceed to trial. At trial, the district court will enter a written order determining whether to grant the petition on the basis that terminating the parental rights was in the best interest of the child or children. To make this determination, the court will determine whether DFS established by clear and convincing evidence of parental fault based on abandonment, neglect, unfitness, failure of parental adjustment, or a posed risk of harm to the child or children.
Standards in Actions to Terminate Parental Rights
To terminate parental rights, a petitioner must prove by clear and convincing evidence that termination is in the child’s best interest and that parental fault exists. See NRS 128.105. A district court’s order terminating parental rights is subject to close scrutiny because the termination of parental rights “is an exercise of awesome power that is tantamount to imposition of a civil death penalty.” See In re Parental Rights as to A.J.G., 122 Nev. 1418, 1423 (2006).
Any order of the court must include the district court’s factual findings that the termination is in the child’s best interest and that parental fault exists are supported by substantial evidence. Id. If a parental termination proceeding is instituted against a parent, the petitioner must establish by clear and convincing evidence that parental fault exists and that the child’s best interest would be served by termination of parental rights. NRS 128.105.
Parental fault can be established by findings that the parent’s conduct constitutes abandonment, neglect, unfitness, failure of parental adjustment, risk of injury, or token efforts. NRS 128.105.
Presumptions in Termination of Parental Rights Cases
In addition to affirmative findings, certain presumptions can arise to establish parental fault and that the child’s best interest would be served by termination.
NRS 432B.590(4) states that “[i]f a child has been placed outside of the home and has resided outside of the home pursuant to that placement for 14 months of any 20 consecutive months, the best interests of the child must be presumed to be served by the termination of parental rights.”
In this regard, when a child has been placed outside his or her home under NRS Chapter 432B for 14 of any 20 consecutive months, “it must be presumed that the parent or parents have demonstrated only token efforts to care for the child.” NRS 128.109(1)(a). These token efforts demonstrate parental fault and give rise to the presumption that termination of the parent’s parental rights is in the child’s best interest. NRS 128.109(1)(a) and (2).
Another presumption, failure of parental adjustment, arises when the parent fails to substantially comply “with the terms and conditions of a plan to reunite the family within 6 months after the date on which the child was placed or the plan was commenced, whichever occurs later.” NRS 128.109(1)(b); NRS 128.105(2)(d).
The Difference Is Personal
Hear From the Families We’ve Helped
-
“His integrity and morals are exemplarily. Mr. Anderson is extremely knowledgeable of the law. He is prepared and fights for his clients. Mr. Anderson has always kept me informed as to the progress of my case.”Jodi
-
“Dan is the consummate professional with a deep background in contractual law. His steady manner guided me through the process and he never wavered even during times when I was a bit emotional.”Charles
-
Meresa B.
Had a great experience when working with Byron Mills during both of our hearings and everything leading up to it. His staff was very attentive and quick to respond to any questions or concerns we had. Would highly recommend Mills and Anderson!
-
“They are very knowledgeable, answered any, and every question I had. Very professional, detail oriented, well prepared, and honest throughout the entire process.”Kasey
-
“If you want to get the job done right you need to check out their office. Thank you so much guys, I appreciate the help.”Marlen G.
-
“Going through a divorce is a very difficult process and they managed to make it a smooth transition for me. I felt so comfortable and their communication skills are excellent. Whenever I called or emailed I received a prompt response.”Marjaana M.
-
“He was well prepared to discuss our situation and had reviewed all the materials I had sent him in advance. He was also very accommodating as the issue was time sensitive.”Ryan L.
-
Mills and Anderson family law is excellent, including his staff, especially Mary O'Donnell. We have an adoption case with them and we got granted just over a month. Thank you very much for all of you!Maung S.